The task
Produce one reviewable output.
Start with the human version. Use AI if helpful. The goal is a short evidence pack a reviewer can inspect, not a private chat transcript.
Task
Find examples where planning delay, appeal, process churn, or local veto politics obviously blocked useful building.
Why it matters
This gives Future Union raw material for the Growth Index, Builder Files, and local pressure kits.
What you produce
Markdown evidence pack with ten examples, one paragraph each, source links, and confidence notes.
Useful inputs
Council pages, planning portals, local press, inspectorate decisions, screenshots, public links.
Steps
- Read the task.
- Gather public sources.
- Write the evidence pack.
- Add caveats.
- Submit or preview for review.
AI-assisted prompt
Ask your AI to help, then keep the claim inspectable.
You are working for Future Union.
Action brief: Planning blockers sprint
Action URL: https://www.futureunion.org.uk/control-room/actions/planning-blockers-sprint/
Board lane: Open now
Parent mission: Check the claims
Time box: 90 minutes
Output type: Evidence pack
Mission:
Find examples where planning delay, appeal, process churn, or local veto politics obviously blocked useful building.
Why it matters:
This gives Future Union raw material for the Growth Index, Builder Files, and local pressure kits.
Inputs:
Council pages, planning portals, local press, inspectorate decisions, screenshots, public links.
Required output:
Markdown evidence pack with ten examples, one paragraph each, source links, and confidence notes.
Acceptance criteria:
Every example has a public source link, named place, delay/blocker type, and one sentence explaining why it matters.
Submission route:
Finish the evidence pack locally, then submit it for review straight from the runner — it sends the pack to Future Union for a human to check, and nothing becomes public without that review. A signed, publish-from-your-machine route is being tested and will sit on top of this.
Rules:
- Use public source links for every factual claim.
- Separate facts, interpretation, caveats, and recommended action.
- Do not invent data, quotes, people, organisations, or legal claims.
- Do not contact third parties, submit FOIs, scrape private systems, or process personal data unless a human explicitly tells you to.
- Include agent/tool, model if known, approximate tokens/runtime if available, and human edits.
- Return a clean Markdown evidence pack a human can review quickly.Run this with an AI agent (advanced)
For developers using Claude Code, Codex, or similar. This sets up the Future Union runner, creates a local workspace, and keeps publishing behind a preview step — nothing goes out without your confirmation.
Current safety boundary: the helper works from one mission folder and publish preview only includes allowlisted mission files. It is not yet a hardened OS sandbox, so use a separate OS user, container, or VM for untrusted agents.
curl -fsS https://www.futureunion.org.uk/agent-pack/fu-runner.sh -o fucr && FU_BASE_URL=https://www.futureunion.org.uk sh fucr mission planning-blockers-sprintNow
1 reviewed output
Review
Accepted current best
Evidence pack
No review score yet
Credited
1 people
Runner links
Feeds and network lane
Preview first. Publish second. The helper shows commits, score, benchmark command, and safety boundary before anything public.
./bin/fu-mission experiment-doctor ./bin/fu-mission experiment-publish