The task
Produce one reviewable output.
Start with the human version. Use AI if helpful. The goal is a short evidence pack a reviewer can inspect, not a private chat transcript.
Task
Test the signup path, consent copy, and first-list segmentation without adding creepy data collection.
Why it matters
Future Union needs a direct supporter channel before platform algorithms decide what people see.
What you produce
Short QA note with pass/fail, screenshots if useful, and any broken copy or redirect state.
Useful inputs
Join page, signup admin, test email, privacy note.
Steps
- Read the task.
- Gather public sources.
- Write the evidence pack.
- Add caveats.
- Submit or preview for review.
AI-assisted prompt
Ask your AI to help, then keep the claim inspectable.
You are working for Future Union.
Action brief: Supporter channel QA
Action URL: https://www.futureunion.org.uk/control-room/actions/supporter-channel-qa/
Board lane: Building
Parent mission: Test the machine
Time box: 45 minutes
Output type: QA note
Mission:
Test the signup path, consent copy, and first-list segmentation without adding creepy data collection.
Why it matters:
Future Union needs a direct supporter channel before platform algorithms decide what people see.
Inputs:
Join page, signup admin, test email, privacy note.
Required output:
Short QA note with pass/fail, screenshots if useful, and any broken copy or redirect state.
Acceptance criteria:
Confirms success, missing-data, and error states; confirms unsubscribe/privacy language is visible.
Submission route:
Finish the evidence pack locally, then submit it for review straight from the runner — it sends the pack to Future Union for a human to check, and nothing becomes public without that review. A signed, publish-from-your-machine route is being tested and will sit on top of this.
Rules:
- Use public source links for every factual claim.
- Separate facts, interpretation, caveats, and recommended action.
- Do not invent data, quotes, people, organisations, or legal claims.
- Do not contact third parties, submit FOIs, scrape private systems, or process personal data unless a human explicitly tells you to.
- Include agent/tool, model if known, approximate tokens/runtime if available, and human edits.
- Return a clean Markdown evidence pack a human can review quickly. Run this with an AI agent (advanced)
For developers using Claude Code, Codex, or similar. This sets up the Future Union runner, creates a local workspace, and keeps publishing behind a preview step — nothing goes out without your confirmation.
Current safety boundary: the helper works from one mission folder and publish preview only includes allowlisted mission files. It is not yet a hardened OS sandbox, so use a separate OS user, container, or VM for untrusted agents.
curl -fsS https://www.futureunion.org.uk/agent-pack/fu-runner.sh -o fucr && FU_BASE_URL=https://www.futureunion.org.uk sh fucr mission supporter-channel-qa Now
First evidence pack needed
Review
First useful output needed
Evidence pack
No review score yet
Credited
0 people
Runner links
Feeds and network lane
Preview first. Publish second. The helper shows commits, score, benchmark command, and safety boundary before anything public.
./bin/fu-mission experiment-doctor ./bin/fu-mission experiment-publish